<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Kommentarer på: Mikrovågor (ugnar)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://tupomedia.se/mat/mikrovagor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tupomedia.se/mat/mikrovagor/</link>
	<description>Alternativ i hälsa, utbildning, energi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 04:48:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Av: Jeff Eric Forssell		</title>
		<link>https://tupomedia.se/mat/mikrovagor/#comment-1328</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Eric Forssell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 04:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tupomedia.se/?page_id=1026#comment-1328</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dr Greger redogör för ev. risker med att äta rå svamp: https://nutritionfacts.org/blog/are-raw-mushrooms-safe-to-eat/ 
I de olika lagnningsmetoder för svamp visar sig mikrovåg 1000W 1 min ger den största minskning av halten av &quot; agaritine, which may be carcinogenic&quot;. 
Samtidigt verkar inte risken vara specielllt stor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Greger redogör för ev. risker med att äta rå svamp: <a href="https://nutritionfacts.org/blog/are-raw-mushrooms-safe-to-eat/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://nutritionfacts.org/blog/are-raw-mushrooms-safe-to-eat/</a><br />
I de olika lagnningsmetoder för svamp visar sig mikrovåg 1000W 1 min ger den största minskning av halten av &#8221; agaritine, which may be carcinogenic&#8221;.<br />
Samtidigt verkar inte risken vara specielllt stor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Av: Jeff		</title>
		<link>https://tupomedia.se/mat/mikrovagor/#comment-700</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 12:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tupomedia.se/?page_id=1026#comment-700</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://www.saferemr.com/
en sida som anser att EMF är skadlig. Jag har inte mer än skummat lite. Det verkar värt att kolla mer på i alla fall.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.saferemr.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.saferemr.com/</a><br />
en sida som anser att EMF är skadlig. Jag har inte mer än skummat lite. Det verkar värt att kolla mer på i alla fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Av: Jeff		</title>
		<link>https://tupomedia.se/mat/mikrovagor/#comment-698</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 10:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tupomedia.se/?page_id=1026#comment-698</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sabine har en massa bra video om fysik. I denna pratar hon om 5G mobiltelefon EMF användning:
https://youtu.be/UOvAZPHDogs
Summary: Energin i 5G radiofotoner är såpass låg så man inte väntar sig kemiska/biologiska skador när det gäller låga effekter (som 100 milliWatt för wifi router  jämfört med 900W = 900000 milliWatt för en mikrovågsugn). Samtidigt, trots planering i &#062;14år så finns inga egentliga studier om dess eventuella hälsoeffekter. 5G stör mätning av väder och ibland flyg.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sabine har en massa bra video om fysik. I denna pratar hon om 5G mobiltelefon EMF användning:<br />
<a href="https://youtu.be/UOvAZPHDogs" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/UOvAZPHDogs</a><br />
Summary: Energin i 5G radiofotoner är såpass låg så man inte väntar sig kemiska/biologiska skador när det gäller låga effekter (som 100 milliWatt för wifi router  jämfört med 900W = 900000 milliWatt för en mikrovågsugn). Samtidigt, trots planering i &gt;14år så finns inga egentliga studier om dess eventuella hälsoeffekter. 5G stör mätning av väder och ibland flyg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Av: Jeff Forssell		</title>
		<link>https://tupomedia.se/mat/mikrovagor/#comment-517</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Forssell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2020 08:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tupomedia.se/?page_id=1026#comment-517</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Saw in Ocean Robins (Food Revolution Network) mail 2020 feb 2 that they have an article about microwaves. Checked it out, partially expecting negative bias. But it seemed pretty positive- mainly pointing out wandering from plastic. 

As far as nutrients it said something about higher HCAs (cancer-causing heterocyclic aromatic amines) than even barbeque. Checked that link and it was a study of goose legs and breast. &quot; The highest total HCA  amount for breast and leg meats belonged to microwaved breast meat (2.20 ng/g) and boiled leg meat (2.42 ng/g).&quot;  så kokt i vatten hade även högre! Weird!

And the garlic thing was a bit fuzzy but contained &quot;Allowing crushed garlic to &quot;stand&quot; for 10 min before microwave heating for 60 s prevented the total loss of anticarcinogenic activity.&quot;  Which is something I do before any heating 

It also mentioned legumes: &quot;The mean in vitro protein digestibility of pressure-cooked and microwaved samples was 79.8% and 74.7%, respectively.&quot;  I would actually expect pressure cooked to be more digestible than ordinary cooked - but that wasn&#039;t compared. 

A bit surprised that in spite of mentioning popcorn several times DOESN&#039;T mention concerns about teflon relatives coming from the highly heated anti fat treated paper bags

 https://foodrevolution.org/blog/are-microwave-ovens-safe/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw in Ocean Robins (Food Revolution Network) mail 2020 feb 2 that they have an article about microwaves. Checked it out, partially expecting negative bias. But it seemed pretty positive- mainly pointing out wandering from plastic. </p>
<p>As far as nutrients it said something about higher HCAs (cancer-causing heterocyclic aromatic amines) than even barbeque. Checked that link and it was a study of goose legs and breast. &#8221; The highest total HCA  amount for breast and leg meats belonged to microwaved breast meat (2.20 ng/g) and boiled leg meat (2.42 ng/g).&#8221;  så kokt i vatten hade även högre! Weird!</p>
<p>And the garlic thing was a bit fuzzy but contained &#8221;Allowing crushed garlic to &#8221;stand&#8221; for 10 min before microwave heating for 60 s prevented the total loss of anticarcinogenic activity.&#8221;  Which is something I do before any heating </p>
<p>It also mentioned legumes: &#8221;The mean in vitro protein digestibility of pressure-cooked and microwaved samples was 79.8% and 74.7%, respectively.&#8221;  I would actually expect pressure cooked to be more digestible than ordinary cooked &#8211; but that wasn&#8217;t compared. </p>
<p>A bit surprised that in spite of mentioning popcorn several times DOESN&#8217;T mention concerns about teflon relatives coming from the highly heated anti fat treated paper bags</p>
<p> <a href="https://foodrevolution.org/blog/are-microwave-ovens-safe/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://foodrevolution.org/blog/are-microwave-ovens-safe/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: tupomedia.se @ 2026-08-23 10:18:09 by W3 Total Cache
-->